Skip to content

Effects of prolonged trauma on Self-Functions

February 15, 2012

Individuals subjected to repeated physical, sexual, or emotional “abuse”, are prone to a wide range of deficiencies in “self-functions”.

Poor early- attachment relationships, deficient emotional nurturance, boundary violations and the lack of a safe “holding-environment” tends to affect the victim of chronic trauma ranging from how they think  to how they emotionally regulate.

Many victims of chronic abuse fail to recall their abuse, but present with an array of perceptions, physical symptoms, and subservience in relationships, not easily connected in memory to their traumatic origins.

The point to note here is that neglected and abused children may develop a wide range of disorders beyond PTSD.

Extended caretaker failure to provide empathy may lead to deficits ranging from shyness and introversion to serious disorders of the self.

More serious maltreatment can lead to Complex Trauma or disorders of the self such as Borderline Personality, Sociopathy, or Pathological Narcissism.

These disorders are bundled together under “Cluster B” of the Personality Disorders in DSM-IV.

Cases of repeated abuse can lead to a search for surrogate caretaking, infantile dependence, and abandonment-depression-characteristics of the Borderline Personality.

These survivors of parental failure may develop a deep self-loathing and direct their negative emotions into self-abuse (such as self-mutilation or even suicide).

A thorough, well-researched review of the impact of child maltreatment across different domains of functioning was published by Cicchetti and Lynch (1995) in Developmental Psychopathology, Volume 2 (Wiley, London, pages 32-72).

The Borderline Patient responds to abandonment by engaging in the projective defenses of Idealization or demonization, and a failure to retrieve the good self-object leads to an abandonment depression.

This can lead to compulsive self-gratification via self various impulsive behaviors such as binging, promiscuity or intoxication; or unmanageable anger can be turned inwards in various forms of self-affliction.

Issues with Power Failure or Submission

Predatorial behavior can be played out both interpersonally and in the global arena.

The victim is often unaware of a personal trauma history as these painful events are “repressed”.

Throughout life, most un-recovered victims organize subsequent relationships around the original abuse-dynamic.

All new relationships may follow a limited template focused on personal safety dominated by appeasement and obedience.

Victims may feel unwittingly trapped within in relationships since they have a narrow range of expected outcomes.

Since victims of early-interpersonal trauma suffer a loss of personal autonomy they may relinquish their personal rights and dignity in order to remain attached.

Abuse-generated expectations and survival tactics may carry-over into the larger world.

Trauma-victims may not feel entitled to self-regard, respect, or affection. They may allow continued abuse by all authority figures, and lack the skills to identify or free themselves from these negative entrapments.

Women may find themselves repeatedly lured by men who are sexually exploitative or degrading, yet cannot be assertive or disrupt their participation in such relationships.

The notion of escape overwhelms them with fear.

Chronic trauma-victims cannot perceive an alternative way to move beyond this narrow script.

In general, such relationships lack spontaneity and fluidity. Victims cannot articulate their goals or make life choices until they have transcended their trauma narrative.

Gaining “ownership” of the “trauma narrative” provides victims the opportunity to enjoy the full landscape of social freedom.

Confronting these maladaptive self-schemas and reclaiming self-agency is a vital component in the recovery from Complex Trauma.

Negative Interpersonal Schemas

As we grow up from infancy, each of us forms mental pictures, “templates,” or “models” of relationships with others, which I refer to as an “interpersonal schemas.”

They are built primarily by our early relationships with parents or other caretakers, and these interpersonal memory templates will influence the dynamics of our future relationships with others.

Victims of interpersonal abuse usually have negative interpersonal schemas that they carry over into their lives as they grow older, and tend to reenact.

Eventually those individuals, abused during childhood, tend to relive the traumatic events in their adult lives.

According to the school of “Cognitive Therapy,” abuse schemas subsequently sabotage all interpersonal relationships.

The victim’s schemas will later translate into miserable or dysfunctional relationships, and such individuals live in a world where to be “attached” means to be “abused.”

The basic elements of the abuse-generated schema are the following:

  • Children have a normal instinct to seek attachment and comfort, even from bad caregivers.
  • Models learned within the context of traumatic relationships become programmed into the brain and are called “interpersonal schemas.”
  • These schemas guide subsequent expectations and behaviors in future interpersonal situations.
  • Childhood abuse distorts and disrupts the formation of healthy schemas.
  • Abused or neglected children carry these distorted schemas into adulthood.
  • These schemas might continue to influence your experiences and feelings about relationships and events throughout your life.
  • They can inadvertently result in patterns of repeated negative relationships.
  • You may be easily exploited or feel helpless to stand up against predators.
  • Such schemas have to be re-shaped in recovery.

Identifying and changing unhealthy relationship patterns are central to the reversal and disruption of these abusive patterns.

Such patterns have to be replaced by the victim’s capacity to feel safe, confident, and empowered in all relationships.

The achievement of this goal frees the individual from the compulsion to “act out” past traumas in the present.

Trauma and Emotional Dysregulation

Emotional regulation refers to our capacity to tolerate all kinds of emotional states while feeling comfortable in one’s own skin and positively engaged in life.

This requires the capacity to soothe oneself, while staying connected with one’s environment.

Victims of severe or prolonged psychological trauma, however, are more likely to feel they are living in a world dominated by internal emotional turbulence or dys-regulation.

Abused children are more likely to feel constantly negative, and are more easily upset by seemingly trivial triggers.

Since abuse victims lack the capacity to neutralize unpleasant feelings or “self-soothe,” they are prone to erupt in the form of angry outbursts.

When triggered, this can lead to self-directed rage, or this can be displaced towards others who serve as triggers to a chain-reaction of unexplained emotional and impulsive behavior.

Alternatively, victims may escape overwhelming distress by numbing themselves with alcohol or illicit drugs, or engaging in other self-injurious behaviors such as binging or self-mutilating.

Effective emotional regulation contributes to more fulfilling relationships, work-effectiveness, and parenting.

Strategies for regulating emotions are learned throughout development, but are primarily embedded in early development by our parents or other caretakers.

Abused children often report parents being unable to respond effectively to their needs, as well as being unable to regulate their own emotions.

Good parenting involves a parent correctly identifying and validating a child’s experience. This is sometimes referred to as a “mirroring response.” When children feel protected, they are more successfully able to learn effective coping strategies, both cognitively (“everything will be all right”) and behaviorally (such as eliciting social support).

Healthy maturation allows one to face negative emotions in relationships by holding onto good internalized objects (such as parents) which have a soothing and containing effect.

When this capacity is lacking because of early neglect or abuse, victims are more likely to continuously re-experience and reenact their early abuses without any emotional safety buffers.

The Neurobiological underpinning of mood dysregulation appears to be driven by the loss of Hippocampal volume, particularly in the left-brain, during prolonged trauma. This results in the accumulation of cytotoxic levels of glucocorticoids and glutamate.

The Hippocampus and amygdala are structures in the limbic brain that are respectively responsible for the restraint or activation of the Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal Axis.

Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy and other functional imaging techniques have recently demonstrated that the right Hippocampus mediates unpleasant moods and subjective experiences, which include feeling endangered and becoming hyper-vigilant.

The left Hippocampus, in contrast, mediates a sense of comfort and well-being.

The fact that trauma appears to cause more shrinkage on the left has a compounding result of more unpleasant feelings, as well as excessive emotional arousal.

Prolonged trauma and cognition

The concept of the “Stockholm syndrome” began on August 23, 1973, when Jan Olsson began a bank robbery that would forever transform the spectrum of how the world would view the outcome of hostage situations.

It started with the storming of a local Kredit Bank in downtown Stockholm, Sweden, and the shooting of the police officers who had gone in after Olsson.

With this action, a six-day ordeal and hostage situation known as the Norrmalmstorg Robbery began.

Three women and one man were confined to a small room, fighting to survive.

The four hostages were taken into the bank’s vault. Dynamite was strapped to them, and they were rigged to traps that would kill the hostages regardless of any rescue attempts.

Yet when these captives were released, they had more sympathy for their captors than the police who had rescued them – and went so far as to publicly decry their own rescue.

Two of the hostages became friends with the captors, establishing a fund to help pay for their defense fees accrued through the trial. They continue to support their captors against the police even today.

The psychologist Nils Bejerot named the captives’ attachment towards their abusers the “Stockholm Syndrome.”

While the phenomenon of “emotional bonding” between hostages and their captors had been familiar in psychological circles, the use of the term “Stockholm syndrome” became popularized following the publicity of two more high profile hostage cases: Patricia Hearst and Elizabeth Smart. Both cases involve the kidnapping of a woman to pursue the ideals of their captors.

The Stockholm syndrome refers to the unique bond of loyalty established between a hostage and his or her captor occurring within the dynamic of the victim’s absolute dependence upon the predator.

This unique attachment established between the victim and captor evolves from the exclusive dependence by the former on the latter.

In exchange for the restricted life granted by the captor, these victims are willing to adopt a false reality in which no harm can come to them.

In the case of Elizabeth Smart, instincts of survival and protection produced the development of a strong bond between herself and Brian Mitchell, characteristic of a Stockholm syndrome.

During her captivity, an attachment developed towards her captor to the point where she even adopted, as her own, the propaganda presented to her.

This paradoxical sense of loyalty was exemplified by her behavior in the willful obstruction of rescue attempts by family and law enforcement.

Smart had heard her uncle searching and calling for her, not far from her hidden location, but did not call out or attempt to draw attention to herself.

The pervasive resistance to be rescued dominated the entire nine months during which she was kept hostage.

It took several years after returning to regular life before Smart was able to testify against her captor.

This reality-distortion of idealizing cult-leaders can also be witnessed in modern history with public idealization of leaders such as Kim-Jong – II,  a merciless tyrant who constellated public support, even adoration, while bankrupting his country and allowing two million citizens to die of starvation.

In an apparent act of self-deception, victims of Stockholm syndrome believe that their irrational empathy for their captors and their ideologies will protect them.

The psychological dynamics of dominance that determine subservient bonding patterns have been observed amongst abused children, cult members, mistreated prisoners of war, and criminal hostage situations.

However, on a more global scale these same predatorial dynamics still occur under Socialist dictatorships such as the Soviet Union, China and North Korea.

In this fashion (through a combination of threat, isolation, and propaganda), political tyranny continues to assert itself over the collective consciousness of large populations inducted into the mythical ideologies of their rulers.

During the Cold War, individuals living under Soviet rule would have to be on constant guard against “thought police.”

Children were indoctrinated in school to inform authorities if their parents spoke critically or questioningly against “the State,” even within the privacy of their home.

In political tyranny, rulers routinely use propaganda and intimidation to “dumb down” the masses. In order to keep group members obedient, political tyrants and even cult leaders prefer to project the image of “being right” and, hence, in charge.

A common methodology of creating a culture of obedience and capitulation is via the fabrication of simplistic ideologies.

This form of interpersonal abuse would fall under the title of “political terrorism.” It is more likely to thrive under conditions of fear and confusion.

The scourge of modern terrorism is built on a paradigm of creating fear and confusion; constellating Archetypal sentiments, and offering ideological remedies.

When entire communities lose their power of critical thinking, who is there to protect them from the exploitations of their leaders ?

 

From → Complex Trauma

2 Comments
  1. nice work; I have a blog as well to look at.

  2. Reblogged this on davidbaisrebeinu and commented:

    In contrast to PTSD where victims exhibit symptoms of heightened arousal and HPA activation, the effect of sustained interpersonal abuse or neglect is predominantly on the victim`s “self-functions”, which are insidious and whose impact manifests on diminished sense of personal agency, restricted social engagement, and a predilection toward trauma-reenactment, with a repetition of a pattern of entrapment in the role of the victim. For such trauma-victims recovery is a life-long endeavor, which begins with the identification of the victim`s unique “trauma-narrative”.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: